Have you ever been in a situation when upper management does not have a clear, unified vision? Recently, I received opposing viewpoints from two different directors on the same project, in one day.
This project I am working on is one of my highest priority projects (I am currently managing around 10 projects at one time). One day, one of the director’s called (we will call Director1) and wanted to add a new feature that would totally change the design and add a lot of rework to the project. This new feature was not mentioned in the beginning, but later mid way through the project. This new feature caused me an extra week of re-work as I tried to obtain more background information. After the week was over, I set up a conference call to discuss the new design with the team and the other director (we will call Director 2). Director 2 asked me why I added this new feature. I stated that Director 1 wanted this new feature and told me it was mandatory. I told Director 2, I was just following orders. Director 2 disagreed with the addition of the new feature (added by Director 1) and told me to cease and desist. Director 2 told me that she will inform Director 1 of this decision. The two directors battled it out and the new feature was thrown out. But it irritated and frustrated me, because I wasted a week of re work that potentially caused a delay. Not to mention being placed in the middle of two battling egos.
I guess from my perspective, I should have made sure both directors were onboard with this new feature before I put in all the extra re-work. But my question is, shouldn’t upper management communicate with each other and agree to a vision before it is released to the rest of the team?




